Inforrm's Blog🔒 SSL Verified

Table of Contents

• ↓ AI: One year on, what Walters v OpenAI tells us about AI hallucinations and defamation liability – Nataly Tedone
• ↓ What we didn’t learn from the Mail Newspapers judgment – Steve Barnett
• ↓ Law and Media Round Up – 20 July 2026 [Updated]
• ↓ Case Law: Vince v Associated Newspapers, Court of Appeal upholds claim for “unfair” data processing by newspaper –
• ↓ Global Freedom of Expression, Columbia University: Newsletter, 16 July 2026
• ↓ United States: Supreme Court rules cellphone location data is protected by the Fourth Amendment – Anne Toomey McKenna
• ↓ Top Alternatives to inforrm.org

6-Month Traffic Trend Estimate

Official Contact & Profiles

Visual representation extracted from inforrm.org

Content Snippets from inforrm.org

"One year after the decision in Walters v OpenAI (Case No. 23-A-04860-2) [pdf], the case remains one of the most significant judicial examinations of how traditional defamation principles apply to generative AI, albeit in a U.S. context. Continue reading"

"This month’s Mail Newspapers judgment in the case brought by Prince Harry and others was a comprehensive defeat for the claimants [2026] EWHC 1637 (KB). The judge found that, in relation to every one of the 57 pleaded articles, the claimants had failed to prove that Mail journalists had used unlawful information gathering (UIG). Continue reading"

"On Wednesday 15 July 2026, the Court of Appeal (Vos MR, Warby LJ and Whipple LJ) handed down judgement in the appeal of Vince v ANL [2026] EWCA Civ 899. Eco entrepreneur, Dale Vince brought a defamation and subsequent data protection claim against Associated Newspapers in relation to the publication of an article which juxtaposed his photograph with a headline referring to a “sex pest” Labour donor, despite the article itself relating to another individual. Continue reading"

"On 15 July 2026, the Court of Appeal handed down an important judgment in Vince v Associated Newspapers ([2026] EWCA Civ 899). This decision establishes, for the first time, that a person can sue a newspaper under data protection law for an “unfair” article even if, under the law of defamation, there is no claim. Continue reading"

Key Topics & Focus Areas for inforrm.org:

AI: One year on, what Walters v OpenAI tells us about AI hallucinations and defamation liability – Nataly Tedone

What we didn’t learn from the Mail Newspapers judgment – Steve Barnett

Law and Media Round Up – 20 July 2026 [Updated]

Case Law: Vince v Associated Newspapers, Court of Appeal upholds claim for “unfair” data processing by newspaper –

Global Freedom of Expression, Columbia University: Newsletter, 16 July 2026

United States: Supreme Court rules cellphone location data is protected by the Fourth Amendment – Anne Toomey McKenna