Welcome to the detailed analysis for dangerousspeech.org. This domain is officially recognized as Dangerous Speech Project Home. According to their official web presence, their primary focus is: "Dangerous speech increases the risk that its audience will condone or participate in violence against members of another group.".
"This is a time of fear in the world: wars, disease, climate crisis, and more, amplified by lies. Building on that, many leaders use a special kind of rhetoric to convince their supporters to perceive other groups of people as monstrous threats. We call this dangerous speech because it leads people to think mass violence is not only acceptable, but necessary. Dangerous speech works â but it can be countered."
"The term âhate speechâ is vague, broad, and in practice, everyone defines it differently. This confusion tends to lead to expansive understandings of hate speech which, in practice, can jeopardize freedom of speech. Indeed, laws against hate speech or hateful speech are often misused to punish and silence journalists, dissenters, and minorities, recently in countries as varied as Hungary, India, Rwanda, Kazakhstan, and Bahrain. We focus instead on dangerous speech since it is a narrower, more specific category, and we define it by its link to something that almost everyone can agree on (unlike the definition of hate speech): violence against a group of people is a grave harm that should be prevented. Also dangerous speech can be quite different from hate speech: sometimes it doesnât even express hate, and instead promotes fear. Definitions of hate speech differ, both in law and in colloquial use, and some aspects of the term remain undefined. For instance, what is hatred? How strong or how durable must emotion be to count as hatred? Another unresolved question is this: does the âhateâ in hate speech mean that the person speaking feels hate, or wants to convince someone else to hate, or wants to make someone feel hated in response to the speech? Generally, âhate speechâ refers to a message that vilifies a person or group of people, because they belong to a group or share an identity of some kind. Legal definitions of hate speech refer to various kinds of groups, defined by religion, race, or ethnicity; others add or omit disability, sexual orientation, gender, or even philosophy of life (Norwegian Penal Code, section 135a). Under all of those definitions, then, âI hate youâ is not hate speech. In practice, the boundaries of hate speech are drawn by prevailing social norms and individual and collective interpretation, so that each person has an idea about what hate speech is, but one personâs notion of hate speech rarely matches anotherâs. Focusing instead on the narrower category of dangerous speech makes it easier to achieve consensus, and to respond effectively. For some examples of debate on what constitutes âhate speechâ see this article on the French newspaper Charlie Hebdoâs cartoons and text, and this New York Times report on students who felt that âVote Trump 2016,â when written in chalk on their campusâ steps, was hate speech. And here is a thoughtful discussion on hate speech by the British writer Kenan Malik, who argues that hate speech should be morally condemned but not criminalized."
By comparing dangerousspeech.org to other leading websites in its niche, marketers and researchers can identify key traffic sources and growth opportunities. Explore our related resources below to find websites similar to dangerousspeech.org.
Yes, according to our latest analysis, we detected a valid SSL certificate ensuring a secure connection.
As of July 24, 2026, dangerousspeech.org holds an estimated domain authority score of 54/100 based on our VisitRank tracking algorithms.
You can find the best alternatives and similar sites to dangerousspeech.org in our explore section, which includes competitors in the E-commerce & Retail sector.
Common Misspellings & Typo Domains for dangerousspeech.org:
"Any kind of group, including but not limited to groups defined by ethnicity, race, religion, gender, disability, and sexual orientation, can be the subject and target of dangerous speech. Unfortunately, the rhetorical techniques of dangerous speech are used against many types of groups, so we do not exclude any."
"If youâd like more information on these cases, for Kenya see this report on post-election violence in 2007 and 2008. For Myanmar, this article on how speech fuels hostile attitudes toward Muslims in that country. For the United States, see for example pages 8-34 of Without Sanctuary: Lynching Photography in America (2000) and Leon Litwackâs description of individuals who participated in lynchings."